With Little Fanfare, Justice Dept. Publishes Final Rules For Firearm Rights Restoration Program Ahead Of Its September Start Date

With little fanfare ahead of its September 21, 2026 launch date, the Justice Department has officially published final rules under 27 C.F.R. Part 107 to reestablish a federal firearm rights restoration program. Following years of statutory defunding and recent Supreme Court rulings like U.S. v. Hemani, this post breaks down how the new ATF petition process works for individuals with federal criminal convictions, who qualifies, and what this shifting federal landscape means for restoring your gun rights.

Read More
Ina Silvergleid
How a Dupage County IL Judge Helped Nullify A 2011 Amendment to Expungement/Sealing Law

In a surprising July 2026 ruling (People v. Jenkins), the Third District Appellate Court backed a DuPage County judge's decision to force a 5-year waiting period to expunge a retail theft supervision record—contradicting the 2-year waiting period established by the Illinois General Assembly over a decade ago. Here is how one judge’s stance created an unexpected obstacle for retail theft expungements in DuPage County, why an unrepresented appeal backfired, and what this means if you are trying to clear your record.

Read More
Ina Silvergleid
Despite Illinois’ Criminal Record Protections Job Seekers Still Face Employment Barriers

Did you know it is illegal for an Illinois employer to deny you a job based on an arrest record? Despite strong protections under the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA), conflicting federal laws under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) mean background check companies routinely disclose non-conviction arrest records to employers anyway. Exploring a real-world case where a job offer was unlawfully rescinded over non-conviction arrests, this post explains the dangerous loophole in employment background checks—and why expunging and sealing your records is the only guaranteed way to protect your career.

Read More
Ina Silvergleid
U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh in on Plight of One LPR with a Criminal Background

Can a Green Card holder be detained at the border for a crime they haven’t been convicted of yet? As the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to rule on a critical immigration case later this year, the legal safety net for Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs) is facing its darkest era yet. Examining the complex decade-long battle of Muk Choi Lau, this post breaks down how federal authorities are using a broad interpretation of the law to target non-citizens facing pending criminal charges—even minor misdemeanors—and why traveling or applying for citizenship with a record has become an unprecedented risk in 2026.

Read More
Ina Silvergleid
Why Immigrants Living in the U.S. Today Face an Uncertain Future

Think a "stateless" status or a dismissed case protects non-citizens from deportation? Under current federal policies, the government is actively using third-country removals to deport long-term legal permanent residents. Using the real-world stories of clients facing ICE detention, this post explores the harsh legacy of the 1996 immigration amendments, the realities of out-of-state ICE facilities, and why a full, unconditional pardon from Governor Pritzker is the absolute last resort to save families from being torn apart.

Read More
Ina Silvergleid
What Does it Mean to Have a Conviction Under U.S. Immigration Law

Did you know that a "dismissed" case or a deferred sentence in Illinois can still count as a conviction under federal immigration law? Because the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) uses a vastly broader definition of "conviction" than state courts, many non-citizens unwittingly jeopardize their Green Cards or legal status. In this post, we break down the stark contrast between Illinois and federal definitions, explain how a criminal defense attorney must protect you, and outline why standard sealing or expungement won't solve an immigration crisis.

Read More
Ina Silvergleid